While gays push to marry, others fear commitment

Now that the tide has turned in favor of gay marriage by America’s second most-populous state permitting it, it’s time to put the debate behind us and focus on more important things, specifically saving American marriage.

Truth regardless of consequences Yes, I know. The opponents of gay marriage have been saying they were doing just that, that their sole intention in obsessing over the issue for three decades was to protect the family and the institution of marriage. But gays marrying has nothing to do with heterosexuals divorcing, and the real crisis in American marriage is not that people of the same sex want to be joined together but that people of the opposite sex want to be split apart. Archbishop Timothy Dolan of New York told CNN, “I’m very sorry that our opponents succeeded in reducing this to anti-gay sentiment. It’s not. It’s pro-marriage, it’s not anti-gay.” I respect the archbishop – but why wasn’t he simultaneously calling for legislation that would make marital counseling tax-deductible in New York and why hasn’t he launched a crusade to cut the number of divorces in half? Is it credible to believe that the only way to save marriage is to stop gays from participating?

My parents divorced when I was 8. There were no gays around to blame. It was mid-1970s America and homosexuals scarcely came out of the closet, let alone married, the very thought being inconceivable. My parents did not argue because they saw two gay women holding hands at an airport. They did not bicker because a rainbow flag hung outside a bar in our neighborhood. They did not decide to end their marriage because they could not agree on how the institution of marriage should be defined. Rather, their marriage ended because it ran out of love.

Get The Jewish Standard Newsletter by email and never miss our top stories Free Sign Up

Their split scarred me for life, just as it does many other children of divorce, as a newly published study in the American Sociological Review demonstrates. The study found little to no impact on children prior to divorce but significant decreases in performance in math and social skills at the time of and following the divorce, which gives the lie to the belief that children are worse off seeing parents fight than seeing them divorce. And no, I do not believe that parents should stay together for the sake of their children. Children should not be jailers. But less so do I believe we should fool ourselves that divorce does not seriously wound children.

My parents love me and did not want me to suffer. But they could not, or chose not to, get along. I have since devoted much of my life toward keeping families together and regularly counsel marriages in crisis. In the 22 years I have done so, no straight couple have ever told me that their problems stem from gays wanting to marry. In most cases, their marital unhappiness resulted from falling out of love or losing attraction, or because one of the partners had been unfaithful. Money problems may have eaten away at the fabric of the relationship. Parents or other family members might have misguidedly intervened and caused friction. Or the pressures of life made it impossible for the couple to spend quality time together. But none of the problems I have counseled could ever be traced back to lesbians wanting to get hitched.

The truth is that the 30-year fight over gay marriage has been a massive distraction for America that has prevented us from focusing on skyrocketing divorce, the growing culture of misogyny and male womanizing, women feeling unreasonably old, fat, and unattractive, the fixation of husbands and wives on celebrity relationships that deprives their own marriages of oxygen, and the dumbing down of America through moronic reality TV. A nation that has little depth will struggle to create soulful relationships. My God, our obsession with gays won’t even allow us to talk about runaway materialism in our culture. When consumer insatiability nearly destroyed our economy in 2008, we responded by fighting over Proposition Eight in California. And as New York State and New Jersey slowly go bankrupt through out-of-control government spending, the state legislatures still bicker about gay marriage.

The passing of the gay marriage bill in New York State has provided an opportunity. There, it’s over. Now let’s focus on what the bill says, which is that even in a secular age where premarital sex and living together are what nearly 80 percent of Americans choose over marriage, guess what, marriage is still the platinum standard. Most people, even those being condemned for it, want to be married rather than just roommates. The bill says that whatever you think of gays wanting to marry, the human condition is such that people want to be with one person forever. That monogamy is the way we all ought to live. That love is real and commitment glorious. That no person wants to be alone, just as the Bible declared in the first chapter of Genesis. That love and romance are to be found specifically in an institution that promotes fidelity and loyalty and that living together in some undefined status – relying on emotional whim rather than rock-solid commitment – is insufficient. Indeed, one of the strangest things about New York’s Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s fight to legalize gay marriage is that he has chosen not to marry his own girlfriend, Sandra Lee. And while that is his private business, it does beg the question of why, if he believes marriage really is so important that all should enjoy its blessings, he hasn’t made the same commitment to the woman he loves.

My traditional readers will find my words scandalous. But is it possible that the victory of gay marriage is actually an opportunity to bolster traditional values?

When I was rabbi at Oxford for 11 years, those most likely to champion gay marriage were least likely to marry themselves. They were liberal, unconventional, and frowned on institutions, especially religion, that they found doctrinaire and oppressive. They believed that marriage was outdated and monogamy unworkable. Marriage lacked passion, and its sole function seemed to be the raising of children. Worse, it did not work. Everyone they knew who was married was either divorced or miserable.

Now, the calculus has changed. We can now tell all the womanizers out there that sowing your wild oats is for cowards and marriage is universally acknowledged by both right and left, liberal and conservative, religious and secular, to be glorious. Marriage is where the action’s at, and merely sleeping together without love and commitment has been discarded by society in a huge legal brawl that has seen marriage triumph. So give up, you boys and girls who devote yourselves to bed-hopping. High school is over. It’s time to grow up.