New York, it’s a charedi-izing town

Most of the growth of the parts of the New York Jewish community in UJA-Federation of New York’s catchment area during the last decade was in two Brooklyn neighborhoods, according to new data from a survey first published last year.

Researchers interviewed 6,000 people living in 26 primary areas to compile information for the study, which covered UJA-Federation’s catchment area.

Last week, UJA-Federation released more details from its 2012 demographic study to show that two-thirds of the rise in the number of Jews living in New York City and Nassau, Suffolk, and Westchester counties occurred in Borough Park and Williamsburg, two largely charedi Orthodox communities.

Get The Jewish Standard Newsletter by email and never miss our top stories Free Sign Up

“When we examine the geographical profile and see where cohorts of the Jewish community – and their diverse characteristics – are found, we recognize both challenges and opportunities for communal leadership,” said John Ruskay, UJA-Federation’s executive vice president and CEO. “A challenge because more people have more needs and those needs differ from area to area throughout the region. And an opportunity because there are now more people to engage in Jewish life and community.”

According to the survey, the number of Jews living in New York and its northern and eastern environs increased by 10 percent over the past decade, to 1.54 million, cementing its status as the largest metropolitan Jewish community in the world outside Israel.

According to the study’s new data, the Jewish population in Borough Park, home to the Bobov chasidic sect and several other charedi communities, rose by 71 percent. In Williamsburg, the seat of the Satmar chasidic sect, the Jewish population increased by 41 percent.

The data offer a glimpse of demographic trends that are reshaping the makeup of the world’s most important diaspora Jewish community. The 469-page study, carried out by a team of sociologists and claiming to be the “most comprehensive and detailed study ever conducted on local Jewish areas,” also shows significant changes elsewhere in the metropolitan area.

The number of Jews living in the northern Manhattan neighborhood of Washington Heights skyrocketed by 144 percent. The Bronx, a onetime bastion of Jewish life that had seen a long period of decline, is rebounding. The number of Jews living there rose from 45,100 to 53,900 in the last 10 years. More Jewish families live in a single Manhattan neighborhood, the Upper West Side (43,900), than in all of Cleveland, Ohio (38,300).

The study also addressed patterns of affiliation. In Brownstone Brooklyn – a large swath of Kings County that includes such neighborhoods as Park Slope, Red Hook, and Windsor Terrace – Jewish residents reported relatively low rates of affiliation. About half the respondents in the area volunteered at charities, although not necessarily Jewish ones.

The highest proportion of married Jewish couples lives on Long Island, particularly in Great Neck and the Five Towns. Residents of these suburbs on average gave more to Jewish causes, traveled to Israel more frequently, and felt a closer connection to the Jewish state than respondents from almost any other county.

The survey also provided information about the religious affiliation of the community. About 40 percent of participants living on the Upper East Side of Manhattan said they identified with Reform Judaism, and more than 30 percent of respondents in the Queens neighborhoods of Flushing and Kew Gardens Hills were affiliated with Conservative Judaism.

Last year’s findings had showed a general decline in the number of those affiliated with both movements.

Ruskay said the data gathered by his organization already had been put to use in assessing the damage wrought by superstorm Sandy.

“Since the data was assembled just a year before the hurricane, we have a baseline that tells us about the character of communities that live in areas affected by the storm,” he said. “In the future, we’ll be able to gauge temporary versus long-term impact on residents by comparing new data with this baseline.”

JTA Wire Service