Isi Leibler has been a dedicated Zionist for his entire career. I know that he loves Israel and is dedicated to its future. So am I.
For my part, that is why, after a career that has included stints running the national United Jewish Appeal (UJA) and a major federation, in June I will become the new chair of the New Israel Fund.
I am taking this on as the capstone of my career, because I believe that the New Israel Fund is the most important organization helping Israel realize its founding principles.
Thus I must address recent attacks on the New Israel Fund, including that of isi Leibler’s, which is found on this page. First, it’s important to understand that Leibler’s viewpoints
are embedded in a right-wing
ideology, one which I’m sure he thinks
necessary to ensure Israel’s survival.
In praising NGO Monitor, however, he should have acknowledged that he is on the board of International Overseers and chairs the Israel-diaspora Committee of the Jerusalem Council on Public Affairs, the body that founded NGO Monitor. Perhaps relying overmuch on that organization, which has long justified its existence by targeting the New Israel Fund, many of Leibler’s facts are wrong.
Guidelines are clear
Every organization funded by the New Israel Fund is a legal Israeli amuta (non-profit organization). Our funding guidelines make clear that we will not fund any organization that “works to deny the right of the Jewish people to sovereign self-determination within Israel, or to deny the rights of Palestinian or other non-Jewish citizens to full equality within a democratic Israel.” And, as has been repeatedly reported, we no longer fund the Coalition of Women for Peace or Mada al Carmel. The organizations we fund must meet our funding guidelines.
Adalah is the most successful Arab-Israeli organization securing the rights of the Arab minority, which probably is the real reason it is so frequently targeted. As co-chairman for the last several years of the Interagency Task Force on Israeli-Arab issues, a coalition of many mainstream organizations working on discrimination against the Arab minority, I share Adalah’s concern. Its latest victory, after a lawsuit in the High Court, was the acceptance by the Israel Land Authority of a request by an Arab family to live in the community town of Rakefet in the Western Galilee. How could Leibler object to the granting of the equal rights promised by Israel’s Declaration of Independence?
Further, fulminating against foreign funding of the human rights community, and outlawing that finding, are the hallmarks of authoritarian regimes in Russia, China, Sudan, and other nations that Israel should have no wish to emulate. The legislation Leibler and his associates at NGO Monitor champion makes no mention of the millions of foreign dollars flowing to extremist settler groups, one of which actually went to court to protect its donor list from public scrutiny. Indeed, NGO Monitor’s complete list of donors is also unavailable to the public.
The New Israel Fund’s audited financial information is available every year for the previous calendar year, as is standard practice, and our complete list of donors is in our Annual Report on our website. Very few Israeli organizations meet NIF’s standard of transparency.
Ideology doesn’t count
Finally, as anyone who has ever actually participated in a grant-making organization knows, our grants process meets the most rigorous international standards of checks and balances. The personal beliefs of the grants director, currently or previously, have no impact on grant decisions, which are overseen by executive staff, board subcommittees, and the board of directors itself. The only objectives, criteria, and guidelines determining NIF grants are those of the NIF itself.
The latest wave of attacks on the NIF comes at a bad time. Right now, most Israelis are feeling particularly besieged. The breakdown in relations with Turkey and Egypt, the freeing of known terrorists in exchange for Gilad Shalit, and the still-looming United Nations vote on the Palestinian statehood request are real reasons for concern.
This, of all times, is not when Israelis and we who love Israel should engage in fratricidal games of “gotcha.”
With the understanding that we will respectfully disagree on serious issues about the direction of the Israeli government’s policy and Israeli society, we must unite in support of a free, just and egalitarian Israel, the Jewish homeland we all support, at peace with itself, and with its neighbors.
JointMedia News Service